Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ ÌìÃÀ´«Ã½ Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
It is a well proved fact that environmental hazards produce more significant harms when children are affected. The main
objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the �right to equality and non-discrimination� offers an appropriate, meaningful
and effective basis to protect children�s environmental health. Doing so requires answering whether there is a strong connection
between being children and being vulnerable to environmental degradation and if there is, whether anti-age discrimination
law opens a possible avenue to challenge this health disparity. I will refer to two different sources of children�s environmental
vulnerability: the disadvantaged situation of children in comparison with adults (as an age group) (this is also true for elders)
and particular disadvantage of the children who are recently born (as a birth cohort). I will argue that the ECtHR and the ECJ
anti-age discrimination case law reveal that children can be protected as an age group. And there are at least two legal strategies
to avoid birth cohort discrimination toward children: 2012 Commission v Hungary ECJ case strategy and 2014 Kaltoft v
Municipality of Billund ECJ case strategy. I will then demonstrate the environmental implications of these cases by giving
details about why this approach is significant and how it can be legally successful.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, ÌìÃÀ´«Ã½ Access Journals